Nature-Science-PLoS

Eleven Reasons Why Manuscripts are Rejected

Manuscripts submitted for peer review publication may be rejected for a number of different reasons, most of which are avoidable.

It should be noted that the reasons for accepting manuscripts are not the mirror image of the reasons for rejecting manuscripts.  The main reasons for accepting manuscripts are: their contribution and relevance to the field, excellence of writing, and quality of the study design.

Many journals expect reviewers to assess the scientific merits and validity of research in submitted manuscripts; however, reviewers can become critical of manuscripts containing numerous language errors, which are difficult to eliminate without careful editing.  Scientific writing demands both good science and well written manuscripts.

Following are the principal reasons why manuscripts are rejected.  They are all equally important because reviewers tend to focus on different issues depending on their individual concerns and the journal’s requirements.

1.  Poor experimental design and/or inadequate investigation. An inadequate sample size, a biased sample, a non-unique concept, and scientific flaws in the study are common faults.

2.  Failure to conform to the targeted journal. This is a common mistake.  The focus of the manuscript is not within the scope of the journal and/or the guidelines of the targeted journal are not followed.  This can easily be avoided by reading the targeted journal and reviewing the author guidelines.

3.  Poor English grammar, style, and syntax. Though poor writing may not result in outright rejection of a manuscript, it may well influence the reviewer’s and editor’s overall impression of the manuscript.  It has been shown that a well written manuscript has a better chance of being accepted.

4.  Insufficient problem statement. It is important to clearly define and appropriately frame the study’s question.

5.  Methods not described in detail. Details are insufficient to repeat the results.  The study design, apparatus used, and procedures followed must be made clear.  In some cases it might be better to put too much information into the methods section rather than to put too little; information deemed unnecessary can always be removed prior to publication.

6.  Overinterpretation of results. Some reviewers have indicated that a clear and ”honest” approach to the interpretation of the results is likely to increase the chances of a manuscript being accepted.  Identify possible biases and confounding variables, both during the design phase of the study and the interpretation of the results.  Describe experimental results concisely.

7.  Inappropriate or incomplete statistics. Using inappropriate statistical methods and overstating the implications of the results is a common error. Use an appropriate test and do not make the statistics too complicated. Quantify and present findings with appropriate indicators of measurement error or uncertainty (such as confidence intervals).

8.  Unsatisfactory or confusing presentation of data in tables or figures. The tables or figures do not conform in style and quantity to the journal’s guidelines and are cluttered with numbers.  Make tables and graphs easy to read.  Some editors may start by looking quickly at the tables, graphs, and figures to determine if the manuscript is worth considering.

9.  Conclusions not supported by data. Make sure your conclusions are not overstated, are supported, and answer the study’s questions.  Be sure to provide alternative explanations, and do not simply restate the results.

10.  Incomplete, inaccurate, or outdated review of the literature. Be sure to conduct a complete literature search and only list references relevant to the study.  The reviewers of your manuscript will be experts in the field and will be aware of all the pertinent research conducted.

11.  Author unwilling to revise the manuscript to address reviewer’s suggestions. This can easily be resolved.  Taking the reviewers’ suggestions into account when revising your manuscript will nearly always result in a better manuscript.  If the editor indicates willingness to evaluate a revision, it means the manuscript may be publishable if the reviewers’ concerns could be addressed satisfactorily.


Nature

Submission
When possible, Articles and Letters should be submitted online. If online submission is not possible, contributions should be posted. E-mailed submissions will not be considered.

online submission: http://mts-nature.nature.com/

Please be sure to read the information on what to include in your cover letter as well as several important content-related issues when putting a submission together.
Before submitting, all contributors must agree to all of Nature’s publication policies. All material condidered for publication in Nature is on condition that all authors agree to these conditions.

ref: http://www.nature.com/nature/authors/gta/index.html#a5

Formatting guide:
manuscript preparation and submission

Information Sheets for Downloading

See the full list of information sheets.

This guide describes how to prepare contributions for submission. A short version is available above (Manuscript preparation and submission). We recommend you read the full version below if you have not previously submitted a contribution to Nature.

We strongly recommend that, before submission, you familiarize yourself with Nature’s style and content by reading the journal, either in print or online, particularly if you have not submitted to the journal recently.

Failure to adhere to these guidelines can seriously delay the handling of your contribution.

Table of contents

1. Formats for Nature contributions

Nature’s main formats for original research are Articles and Letters. In addition, Nature also publishes other submitted material as detailed below (Section 1.4). Mission statements and short summaries of the content published in each of these sections is available for downloading (doc 40KB).

1.1 Articles

are original reports whose conclusions represent a substantial advance in understanding of an important problem and have immediate, far-reaching implications. They do not normally exceed 5 pages of Nature and have no more than 50 references. (One page of undiluted text is about 1,300 words.)

Articles have a summary, separate from the main text, of up to 150 words, which does not have references, and does not contain numbers, abbreviations, acronyms or measurements unless essential. It is aimed at readers outside the discipline. This summary contains a paragraph (2-3 sentences) of basic-level introduction to the field; a brief account of the background and rationale of the work; a statement of the main conclusions (introduced by the phrase ‘Here we show’ or its equivalent); and finally, 2-3 sentences putting the main findings into general context so it is clear how the results described in the paper have moved the field forwards.

Authors are encouraged to include a link to a simple schematic, included as Figure 1 of their Supplementary Information, that summarises the main finding of the paper, where appropriate (for example to assist understanding of complex details in cell, structural and molecular biology disciplines).

Articles are typically 3,000 words of text, beginning with up to 500 words of referenced text expanding on the background to the work (some overlap with the summary is acceptable), before proceeding to a concise, focused account of the findings, ending with one or two short paragraphs of discussion.

The text may contain a few short subheadings (not more than six in total) of no more than 40 characters each (less than one line of text in length).

Articles typically have 5 or 6 display items (figures or tables).

Top of page

1.2 Letters

are short reports of original research focused on an outstanding finding whose importance means that it will be of interest to scientists in other fields.

They do not normally exceed 4 pages of Nature, and have no more than 30 references. They begin with a fully referenced paragraph, ideally of about 200 words, but certainly no more than 300 words, aimed at readers in other disciplines. This paragraph starts with a 2-3 sentence basic introduction to the field; followed by a one-sentence statement of the main conclusions starting ‘Here we show’ or equivalent phrase; and finally, 2-3 sentences putting the main findings into general context so it is clear how the results described in the paper have moved the field forwards.

Please refer to our annotated example (doc 40KB) to see how the summary paragraph for a Letter should be constructed.

Authors are encouraged to include a link to a simple schematic, included as Figure 1 of their Supplementary Information, that summarises the main finding of the paper, where appropriate (for example to assist understanding of complex detail in cell, structural and molecular biology disciplines).

The rest of the text is typically about 1,500 words long. Any discussion at the end of the text should be as succinct as possible, not repeating previous summary/introduction material, to briefly convey the general relevance of the work.

Letters typically have 3 or 4 small display items (figures or tables).

Word counts refer to the text of the paper. References, title, author list and acknowledgements do not have to be included in total word counts.

Top of page

1.3 Communications Arising and Corrections

Communications Arising are exceptionally interesting or important comments and clarifications on original research papers or other peer-reviewed material published in Nature, which are published online only.

Corrections to peer-reviewed material published in Nature.

For details of these sections, and instructions for submission please access the Communications Arising pages.

Top of page

1.4 Other contributions to Nature

Please access the other submitted material pages for further details on any of the contribution types below.

Top of page

2. The editorial process

See getting published in Nature for an explanation of Nature’s editorial criteria for publication, refereeing policy and how editors handle papers after submission.

Top of page

3. Presubmission enquiries

If you wish to enquire whether your Article or Letter might be suitable for consideration by Nature, please use our online presubmission enquiry service. All presubmission enquiries must include a cover paragraph to the editor stating the interest to a broad scientific readership, a fully referenced summary paragraph in the style for Letters to Nature, and a reference list.

Top of page

4. Readability

Nature is an international journal covering all the sciences. Contributions should therefore be written clearly and simply so that they are accessible to readers in other disciplines and to readers for whom English is not their first language.

Essential but specialized terms should be explained concisely but not didactically.

For gene, protein and other specialized names authors can use their preferred terminology so long as it is in current use by the community, but they must give all known names for the entity at first use in the paper. Authors in doubt about terminology are advised to use internationally agreed nomenclature for genes and for mouse strains.

Taxonomy. Authors of papers that contain taxonomy (that is, the formal nomenclature and description of new species) should be aware that it is possible for third parties to exploit the prior publication of nomenclature at any time between online posting of a preprint and print publication date in a journal, by publishing the name in print and thus asserting priority according to the rules of the Code of Zoological Nomenclature. Nature takes no responsibility for such assertions of priority in the case of manuscripts it publishes if those manuscripts have previously appeared in the public domain as online preprints or other form of online posting.

Nature’s editors provide detailed advice about format before contributions are formally accepted for publication. Nature’s editors often suggest revised titles and rewrite the summaries of Articles and first paragraphs of Letters so the conclusions are clear to a broad readership.

After acceptance, Nature’s subeditors (copyeditors) ensure that the text and figures are readable and clear to those outside the field, and edit papers into Nature’s house style. They pay particular attention to summary paragraphs, overall clarity, figures, figure legends and titles.

Proofs are sent before publication; authors are welcome to discuss proposed changes with Nature’s subeditors, but Nature reserves the right to make the final decision about matters of style and the size of figures.

A useful set of articles providing general advice about writing and submitting scientific papers can be found in SciDev.Net‘s « How do I? » section.

Top of page

5. Format of Articles and Letters.

Contributions should be double-spaced and written in English (spellings as in the Oxford English Dictionary)

Contributions should be organized in the sequence: title, text, methods, references, Supplementary Information line (if any), acknowledgements, author contributions (optional), author information (containing data deposition statement, interest declaration and corresponding author line), tables, figure legends.

Top of page

5.1 Titles

do not exceed two lines in print. This equates to 90 characters (including spaces) for Letters, or 75 characters (including spaces) for Articles. Titles do not normally include numbers, acronyms, abbreviations or punctuation. They should include sufficient detail for indexing purposes but be general enough for readers outside the field to appreciate what the paper is about.

Top of page

5.2 Text

Articles should fill no more than 5 pages, and Letters no more than 4 pages, of Nature. An uninterrupted page of text contains about 1,300 words. A typical Article contains about 3,000 words of text and, additionally, five small display items (figures and/or tables) with brief legends, reference list and methods section if applicable. A typical Letter to Nature contains about 1,500 words of text (excluding the first paragraph of Letters, figure legends, reference list and the methods section if applicable) and four small display items (figures and/or tables) with brief legends (see 5.9 for instructions on sizing figures).

When submitting new or revised manuscripts, authors should state in a cover letter to the editor their rough estimate of the length of their paper in terms of number of pages of Nature.

Authors of contributions that significantly exceed the limits stated here or specified by the editor will have to shorten their papers before acceptance, inevitably delaying publication.

Nature requires authors to specify the contribution made by their co-authors in the end notes of the paper. For more details, see our authorship policies.

If authors regard it as essential to indicate that two or more co-authors are equal in status, they may be identified by an asterisk symbol with the caption ‘These authors contributed equally to this work’ immediately under the address list. If more than three co-authors are equal in status, this should be indicated in the author contributions statement.

Present addresses appear immediately below the author list (below the footnote rule at the bottom of the first page) and may be identified by a dagger symbol; all other essential author-related explanation is in the acknowledgements.

We prefer authors to format Articles or Letters using Nature’s Word template.

Top of page

5.3 Methods.

If brief (less than 200 words in total), they can be included in the text at an appropriate place.

Otherwise, they should be described at the end of the text in a ‘Methods’ section of no more than 300 words.

Descriptions of methods already published should be avoided; a reference number can be provided to save space, with the new addition or variation briefly stated.

If more space is required for Methods, the author should call the 300-word section ‘Methods Summary’ and provide an additional ‘Methods’ section at the end of the paper. This Methods section should not normally exceed 1,000 words of text, and should be subdivided by short bold headings referring to methods used. If further references are included in this additional section, the numbering should continue from the end of the last reference number in the rest of the paper and the list should accompany the additional ‘Methods’ at the end of the paper. There should be no duplication between ‘Methods Summary’, the additional ‘Methods’ section and the Supplementary Information. The Methods section cannot contain figures or tables (essential display items can be included in the Supplementary Information).

This Methods section will appear in the online PDF and in the full-text (HTML) version of the paper online, but will not appear in the printed issue. The Methods Summary will appear in the printed issue.

Top of page

5.4 References

are each numbered, ordered sequentially as they appear in the text, methods summary, tables, boxes, figure legends, online-only methods.

When cited in the text, reference numbers are superscript, not in brackets unless they are likely to be confused with a superscript number.

The maximum number of references, strictly enforced, is 50 for Articles and 30 for Letters. Only one publication can be listed for each number.

Only articles that have been published or submitted to a named publication should be in the reference list; papers in preparation should be mentioned in the text with a list of authors (or initials if any of the authors are co-authors of the present contribution).

Published conference abstracts, numbered patents and preprints on recognized servers may be included in reference lists, but text, grant details and acknowledgements may not. (An exception is the highlighted references which we ask authors of Reviews, Progress and Insights articles to provide.)

All authors should be included in reference lists unless there are more than five, in which case only the first author should be given, followed by ‘et al.’.

Please follow the style below in the published edition of Nature in preparing reference lists.

  • Authors should be listed surname first, followed by a comma and initials of given names.
  • Titles of all cited articles are required. Titles of articles cited in reference lists should be in upright, not italic text; the first word of the title is capitalized, the title written exactly as it appears in the work cited, ending with a full stop. Book titles are italic with all main words capitalized. Journal titles are italic and abbreviated according to common usage; authors can refer to Nature, the Index Medicus or the American Institute of Physics style manual for details.
  • Volume numbers are bold. The publisher and city of publication are required for books cited. (Refer to published papers in Nature for details.)
  • References to web-only journals should give authors, article title and journal name as above, followed by url in full – or doi if known – and the year of publication in parentheses.
  • References to websites should give authors if known, title of cited page, url in full, and year of posting in parentheses.

Top of page

5.5 End notes

are brief and follow the reference list.

Please refer to our annotated example (doc 225KB) to see how the end notes appear in a Nature paper.

Papers containing Supplementary Information contain a statement after the reference list:

Supplementary Information is linked to the online version of the paper at http://www.nature.com/nature.

If authors have included a schematic summarising the main result of the paper as Supplementary Information, a sentence should follow along the lines of « A figure summarising the main result of this paper is also included as SI ».

Acknowledgements should be brief, and should not include thanks to anonymous referees and editors, inessential words, or effusive comments. A person can be thanked for assistance, not « excellent » assistance, or for comments, not « insightful » comments, for example.

Author Contributions: authors are required to include a statement to specify the contributions of each co-author. The statement can be up to several sentences long, describing the tasks of individual authors referred to by their initials. See the authorship policy page for further explanation and examples.

Author Information: Authors should include a set of statements at the end of the paper, in the following order:

  • Data deposition statement if appropriate, with the url and relevant numbers for public database accession.
  • A sentence reading « Reprints and permissions information is available at npg.nature.com/reprintsandpermissions ».
  • Competing financial interests statement.
  • A sentence reading « Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to XX », where XX refers to one e-mail address. Nature expects this identified author to respond to readers’ enquiries and requests for materials, and to coordinate the handling of any other matters arising from the published contribution, including corrections complaints. The author named as corresponding author is not necessarily the senior author, and publication of this author’s name does not imply seniority. Authors may include more than one email address if essential, in which event Nature will communicate with the first-listed address for any post-publication matters arising, and expect that author to coordinate with the other coauthors.

Top of page

5.6 Statistics

Authors should ensure that any statistical analysis used is sound and that it conforms to the journal’s guidelines. To minimize the chance of statistical errors, authors can consult the statistical checklist (doc 44KB).

The following is a brief guide to Nature’s requirements to assist authors. We expect the below to be of use mainly to authors in the biomedical sciences but the principles apply to all disciplines.

Every paper that contains statistical testing should state the name of the statistical test, the n for each statistical analysis, the comparisons of interest, a justification for the use of that test (including, for example, a discussion of the normality of the data when the test is appropriate only for normal data), the alpha level for all tests, whether the tests were one-tailed or two-tailed, and the actual P value for each test (not merely « significant » or « P < 0.5 »). It should be clear what statistical test was used to generate every P value. These details should be reported briefly at the most appropriate place in the text: either in the text of a Methods section (if one is present), or as part of a Table or Figure caption.

Data sets should be summarized with descriptive statistics, which should include the n for each data set, a clearly labelled measure of centre (such as the mean or the median), and a clearly labelled measure of variability (such as the standard deviation or range). Ranges are more appropriate than standard deviations or standard errors for small data sets. Graphs should include clearly labelled error bars as part of the figure legend. Authors must state whether a number that follows the ± sign is a standard error (s.e.m.) or a standard deviation (s.d.).

If there is scope for doubt, authors must justify the use of a particular test and explain whether their data conform to the assumptions of the tests, as part of the Supplementary Information accompanying their paper. Three errors are particularly common, and we ask authors of these types of study to provide appropriate verification in their manuscripts or as Supplementary Information:

  • Multiple comparisons: When making multiple statistical comparisons on a single data set, authors should explain how they adjusted the alpha level to avoid an inflated Type I error rate, or they should select statistical tests appropriate for multiple groups (such as ANOVA rather than a series of t-tests).
  • Normal distribution: Many statistical tests require that the data be approximately normally distributed; when using these tests, authors should explain how they tested their data for normality. If the data do not meet the assumptions of the test, then a non-parametric alternative should be used instead.
  • Small sample size: When the sample size is small (less than about 10), authors should use tests appropriate to small samples or justify their use of large-sample tests.

Authors should be aware that all referees are asked to review any statistical analysis present and to ensure that it is sound and that it conforms to the journal’s guidelines.

Top of page

5.7 Tables.

Tables should each be presented on a separate page, portrait (not landscape) orientation, and upright on the page, not sideways.

Tables have a short, one-line title in bold text. Tables should be as small as possible. Bear in mind the size of a Nature page as a limiting factor when compiling a table.

Symbols and abbreviations are defined immediately below the table, followed by essential descriptive material as briefly as possible, all in double-spaced text.

Top of page

5.8 Figure legends.

Figure legends should be listed one after the other, as part of the text document, separate from the figure files. Please do not write a legend below each figure.

Each figure legend should begin with a brief title for the whole figure and continue with a short description of each panel and the symbols used. For contributions with methods sections, legends should not contain any details of methods, or exceed 100 words (fewer than 500 words in total for the whole paper). In contributions without methods sections, legends should be fewer than 300 words (800 words or fewer in total for the whole paper).

All error bars must be defined in the figure legend, as discussed in Section 5.6 above.

Top of page

5.9 Figures

Nature requires figures in electronic format. Please ensure that all digital images comply with the Nature guide for digital images.

Figures should be as small and simple as is compatible with clarity. The goal is for figures to be comprehensible to readers in other or related disciplines, and to assist their understanding of the paper.

Unnecessary figures and parts (panels) of figures should be avoided: data presented in small tables or histograms, for instance, can generally be stated briefly in the text instead. Avoid unnecessary complexity, colouring and excessive detail.

Figures should not contain more than one panel unless the parts are logically connected; each panel of a multipart figure should be sized so that the whole figure can be reduced by the same amount and reproduced on the printed page at the smallest size at which essential details are visible. For guidance, the printable area of a Nature page is 183mm wide and 247mm deep.

Amino-acid sequences should be printed in Courier (or other monospaced) font using the one-letter code in lines of 50 or 100 characters.

Authors describing chemical structures are requested to use the Nature Chemical Biology guidelines.

Some brief guidance for figure preparation:

Lettering in figures (labelling of axes and so on) should be in lower-case type, with the first letter capitalized and no full stop.

Units should have a single space between the number and the unit, and follow SI nomenclature or the nomenclature common to a particular field. Thousands should be separated by commas (1,000). Unusual units or abbreviations are defined in the legend.

Scale bars should be used rather than magnification factors.

Layering type directly over shaded or textured areas and using reversed type (white lettering on a coloured background) should be avoided where possible.

Where possible, text, including keys to symbols, should be provided in the legend rather than on the figure itself.

At submission, figures should be at good enough quality to be assessed by referees, ideally as JPEGs. Authors are advised to follow the online (or postal) submission guidelines with respect to sizing, resolution and labelling.

Costs:
A contribution towards the total cost of reproduction of colour figures is requested. We currently charge £735 for the first colour figure and £262.50 for each additional figure. Inability to pay this charge will not prevent publication of colour figures judged essential by the editors

Top of page

5.10 Production-quality figures.

When a manuscript is accepted in principle for publication, the editor will ask for high-resolution figures. Do not submit publication-quality figures until asked to do so by an editor. At that stage, please prepare figures according to these guidelines (pdf 566KB).

Please note that print-publication quality figures are large and it is not helpful to upload them at the submission stage. Even if they will upload onto the Nature submissions site, many referees’ institutions have email systems that will not accept large attachments. Authors will be asked for high-quality figures at the time of acceptance of their article for publication, so it is not necessary to send them at the submission stage.

Top of page

5.11 Supplementary Information

This is online-only, peer-reviewed material that is essential background to the Article or Letter (for example, large data sets, methods, calculations), but which is too large or impractical, or of interest only to a few specialists, to justify inclusion in the printed version of the paper. See the Supplementary Information page for further details.

Nature strongly encourages authors to include a simple schematic as Figure 1 of their SI that summarises the main finding of the paper, where appropriate (for example, to assist understanding of complex detail in cell, structural and molecular biology disciplines).

Top of page

5.12 Characterization of chemical materials

For guidelines describing Nature’s standards for experimental methods and the characterization of new compounds, please see the information sheet on the characterization of chemical materials,and the Nature Chemical Biology guidelines.

Top of page

6. Submission

When possible, Articles and Letters should be submitted online. If online submission is not possible, contributions should be posted. E-mailed submissions will not be considered.

Please be sure to read the information on what to include in your cover letter as well as several important content-related issues when putting a submission together.

Before submitting, all contributors must agree to all of Nature’s publication policies. All material condidered for publication in Nature is on condition that all authors agree to these conditions.

Top of page

7. Other Nature and NPG journals

Please see Publications and services for details of the other journals published by the Nature Publishing Group.

An account of the relationship between all the Nature journals is provided at the Nature family page.

Supplementary information

http://www.nature.com/nature/authors/submissions/final/suppinfo.html

Publicités

Une Réponse to “Nature-Science-PLoS”

  1. Gaylord Nossett Says:

    Je vous conseille de visiter ce site, ils sont sérieux et très rapide.

Laisser un commentaire

Entrez vos coordonnées ci-dessous ou cliquez sur une icône pour vous connecter:

Logo WordPress.com

Vous commentez à l'aide de votre compte WordPress.com. Déconnexion / Changer )

Image Twitter

Vous commentez à l'aide de votre compte Twitter. Déconnexion / Changer )

Photo Facebook

Vous commentez à l'aide de votre compte Facebook. Déconnexion / Changer )

Photo Google+

Vous commentez à l'aide de votre compte Google+. Déconnexion / Changer )

Connexion à %s


%d blogueurs aiment cette page :